NORTH CAROLINA BANDMASTERS ASSOCIATION
MARCHING BAND CONTEST
EVALUATION FORM

Please refrain from using special characters (#, $, %, ^, &, *)
other than "@" and standard punctuation when filling out this form.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Name of Person Completing Form (Band Directors Only)  
School  
Contest Being Evaluated  
Band Overall Score
 
Today's Date  
MUSIC PERFORMANCE ENSEMBLE
The commentary provided by the judge was reflective of the performance.
 
The commentary provided by the judge accurately identified areas of concern.
 
The commentary provided by the judge offered viable suggestions for
improvement.
 
The commentary provided by the judge addressed the sub-captions on the
sheet.
 
Vocabulary used by the judge reflected the verbiage on the sheet.
 
Based on the commentary provided by the judge, the score given placed the
band in the appropriate box.
 
Additional Comments  
MUSIC PERFORMANCE INDIVIDUAL
The commentary provided by the judge was reflective of the performance.
 
The commentary provided by the judge accurately identified areas of concern.
 
The commentary provided by the judge offered viable suggestions for
improvement.
 
The commentary provided by the judge addressed the sub-captions on the
sheet.
 
Vocabulary used by the judge reflected the verbiage on the sheet.
 
Based on the commentary provided by the judge, the score given placed the
band in the appropriate box.
 
The judge commented on the percussion (drumline and front ensemble) performance.
 
The judge provided balanced commentary related to wind
performance and percussion (drumline and front ensemble) performance.
 
Additional Comments  
MUSIC PERFORMANCE EFFECT
 
Judge 1
Judge 2
The commentary provided by the judge was reflective of the performance.
The commentary provided by the judge accurately identified areas of concern.
The commentary provided by the judge offered viable suggestions for
improvement.
The commentary provided by the judge addressed the sub-captions on the
sheet.
Vocabulary used by the judge reflected the verbiage on the sheet.
Based on the commentary provided by the judge, the score given placed the
band in the appropriate box.
The commentary provided by the judge identified performance concerns in
relation to their impact on the overall effect of the performance.
The two music effect judges were consistent in their commentary and scoring.
 
If not, how many points separated the two scores.
 
Additional Comments  
VISUAL PERFORMANCE
The commentary provided by the judge was reflective of the performance.
 
The commentary provided by the judge accurately identified areas of concern.
 
The commentary provided by the judge offered viable suggestions for
improvement.
 
The commentary provided by the judge addressed all sub-captions on the
sheet.
 
Vocabulary used by the judge reflected the verbiage on the sheet.
 
Based on the commentary provided by the judge, the score given placed the
band in the appropriate box.
 
The visual performance judge commented on the colorguard performance.
 
The visual performance judge provided balanced commentary related to band
performance and colorguard performance.
 
Additional Comments  
VISUAL EFFECT
The commentary provided by the judge was reflective of the performance.
 
The commentary provided by the judge accurately identified areas of concern.
 
The commentary provided by the judge offered viable suggestions for
improvement.
 
The commentary provided by the judge addressed all sub-captions on the
sheet.
 
The commentary provided by the judge addressed all sub-captions on the
sheet.
 
Based on the commentary provided by the judge, the score given placed the
band in the appropriate box.
 
The commentary provided by the judge identified performance concerns in
relation to their impact on the overall effect of the performance.
 
Additional Comments  
GENERAL AJUDICATION
Please identify specific judges that you feel were outstanding and provided
valuable commentary for you, your staff and your students.
 

Please identify specific judges that you feel did not provide commentary
of value to you, your staff and your students.

 
Additional Comments  

 

CONTEST ADMINISTRATION

Registration materials were published with accurate show information.
 
Receipt of registration was acknowledged by show host in a timely manner.
 
Schedule of performances was published in ample time to plan our trip details.
 
NCBA Handbook with show specific additions was distributed in a timely manner.
 
The show specific instructions were easy to follow and understand
 
The NCBA Handbook policies and procedures were followed.
 
The show was run efficiently and effectively.
 
The parent and student help (guides, registration, etc.) provided knowledgeable assistance.  
Additional Comments